Friday, December 9, 2011

What happens when an adult takes a standardized test?

De Cito Eindtoets Basisonderwijs.Image via WikipediaIt finally happened.  The Washington Post describes what happens when an adult takes a 10th grade standardized test.  The December 5th article relays the experience with predictable results: 17% math & 62% reading.  The best part of this story is that the gentleman is a member of the school board.

I proposed an experiment such as this in a previous post about Guam's SAT criticisms.  Perhaps when more adults commit acts of bravery such as this, the greater public will see the folly of standardized testing.  It became clear to the school board member...

“It seems to me something is seriously wrong. I have a bachelor of science degree, two masters degrees, and 15 credit hours toward a doctorate.
I help oversee an organization with 22,000 employees and a $3 billion operations and capital budget, and am able to make sense of complex data related to those responsibilities."

... and yet he failed the SAT.  

So what should we do?  Should we require more tests?  How about SAT testing every 2 years until you reach the retirement age - would that cover it?  Perhaps we should find his teachers and do a thorough re-evaluation of their abilities.  Maybe the schools he attended should be penalized somehow; withdraw some federal funding from them or impose some other financial penalty.  I know, how about we create a special program that would accommodate persons with double masters degrees and manage large corporations?  Maybe we should just label him as a failure or constantly rank him against other adults.

How about this.  Why don't we take a hard look at our educational system.  Let's build a new one that is relevant for today.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

The Wikipedia debate

Image representing Wikipedia as depicted in Cr...Image via CrunchBase
I just came across an excellent article that examines if Wikipedia should be trusted and how it should be used.  Truce Be Told from the Harvard Graduate School of Education looks at the pros and cons, and how Wikipedia has evolved over the years.  Read the article and consider how it applies to all sources of information (including this Blog!)

 Now more than ever, as students use the Internet as a resource for school projects, the idea that teachers should embrace is that proper research is accomplished the same way as it always has been.  The problem isn't any particular site; one should always use multiple sources, examine their reliability, and give citation to information gained.  As far as Wikipedia, ...

"Educators can use the site to teach about online credibility, fact checking, primary and secondary sources, crowd sourcing … rather than simply banning it.”
Enhanced by Zemanta